Monday, October 18, 2010

Unit-1 -Process of Reading

The psychological processes involved in reading are highly complex.
The modern psychology of learning views reading as more than the simple association of printed symbols with their meaning. Hildreth (1958) is of the view that ‘Reading is a two-fold process: first, there is the mechanical aspect: the psychological responses to the print consisting of certain oculo­motor skills, the eye movements through which sensations are conveyed to the brain; and second, the mental process through which the meaning of sense impressions is perceived and interpreted, involving thinking, with swift inferences.’ As the eyes move rhythmically across the lines of print, sensations are received which are interpreted almost instantly by the mind as ideas expressed in language.

1. Physiological Process of Reading / Physical component
To recognize a word is the first step of the reading process.Reading as a visual task-The visual symbol of the written or printed word is the means by which the appro­priate sounds and images are evoked in the mind of the reader. To receive a clear image of the printed word the eyes must focus on it. In reading the eyes do not make a continuous sweep across the page. Rather they move in quick, short suc­cessive movements known as pauses or fixations. A pause or fixation is the stop that the eyes make so that it can react to the graphic stimuli. In the initial stages of reading the duration of each fixation will tend to be relatively long. There will be many regressive movements also when the reader will make return movements to words that were not recog­nized or comprehended before. Gradually as the child’s reading ability increases the duration of each fixation will decre­ase and the number of fixations per line will become smaller with fewer regressions. As a skilled reader we seldom sound out the letters in a word or the words in a sentence. We do not even look at them individually. Eye fixation studies show that in reading the eyes jump three or four times a second taking in gulps of information at each pause.
Normally eye movements vary according to the diffi­culty of reading matter or with a change of purpose. A good reader is distinguished from poor reader by his better word recognition, word analysis and comprehension and these are frequently reflected in more efficient eye movements.

2. Psychological Process of Reading / Psychological Component

Perception-
Perception refers to the interpretation of every thing that we sense, since the symbol has no meaning of its own, perception must go beyond the sensory data. The reader does not see the object, person or experience of which the author writes. Meaning does not come automatically out of word. The child’s reactions to the printed words are determined by the experiences that he has had with these objects or events for which the symbol stands. Thus perception is a cognitive process by which the visual impressions become meaningful in the light of the individual’s past experience and present needs.
Individuals differ in their perceptual sytles. Strang (1967) is of the view that able learners and better readers see words as wholes while the poor readers perceive word fragments and tend to be preoccupied with unimportant details. Able readers recognize familiar syllables and words almost as quickly as individual letters and take in phrases and short sentences as readily as single words. Efficient readers require fewer clues than do poor readers in order to recognize words or phrases.

Concept Formation-
The idea of forming perceptions is related to the idea of forming concepts. When perceptions are grouped into larger patterns that embrace classes or cate­gories, conceptualization occurs. A concept is a process which helps a person to recognize similarities in otherwise diverse objects, situations or events. It contributes further to abstract thinking and generalization. Suppose the teacher wants to teach a child about a tree. Once the child has seen a mango tree, he should be able to recognize the coconut tree also as a tree by referring back to his old experience inspite of the fact that both the trees are quite different in their shape and size. So the child learns after a variety of experiences to see the simi­larities in the trees although they look different from each other. He begins to generalize-or see that they stand straight -they have leaves etc. “So this is how the concepts are formed -the idea of taking all of the similarities from a body of diverse things and seeing them as having certain common family characteristics”. (Berg, 1977).
Persons lacking in the ability of concept formation and generalization find it difficult to recognize an idea unless it is very specific and well explained. Conceptual ability and reading proficiency have a positive relation. Children of normal intelli­gence who often fail in reading in upper primary grades are often deficient in this ability. The teacher should help the students to classify, to organise, to unify ideas and details under generalized headings. This training will help the student to learn concepts more effectively.

Recognition of word meaning-
Children go through stages as they learn to interpret words. Concrete and specific con­cepts are developed first i.e., relating an object to its function: a chair is to sit. The child gradually engages in more complex thinking. ‘The concept of time in sequence, and the concepts of latitude, sphericity, altitude or longitude, for example generally do not develop before grades six or seven. Cause and effects relations rarely are understood before the age of nine, and many social concepts escape children until they are twelve or thirteen’ (Dechant, 1964,). Major determinants of meaning are- experience, culture, affective factors and our own perception of them. These elements combine to make our interpretations of a word very personalistic experience.
Effective word recognition is basic to all progress in reading. Sounding out a word will give the reader its meaning if the word is in his speaking vocabulary. But if the word is unfam­iliar, he will have to use other ways of unlocking its meaning. Such as (a) deriving the meaning from the context, (b) studying the form and structure of the word to get clues from familiar parts, (c) looking it up in the dictionary. In making an accurate interpretation of the meaning of a passage one must take into account the context-time and place, the authors’ intention and purpose etc.

Comprehension
Comprehension is the ultimate goal of all readings. It carries the understanding of a word or a phrase beyond recognition to the understanding of the meaning intended by the author. This involves determining the meanings of words in their language setting and at the same time linking the meaning into larger language patterns and fusing them to a chain of related ideas, usually those that author has in mind (Chacko, 1966). Whether one is reading for knowledge and
information or for sheer pleasure, demand for meaning is central. The degree of understanding depends upon many factors, such as, the nature of the reading task, the clarity of its expression, the reader’s purpose, interest and his back­ground and past experience.
Comprehension takes place on three levels: literal meaning or construction of meaning, interpretation of meaning, and evaluation of meaning. Edgar Dale has called them ‘Reading on the lines’, ‘Reading between the lines’, and ‘Reading beyond the lines’.

Literal Meaning-The first level requires the students to derive literal meaning from sequential words and their gram­matical relations in sentences and paragraphs. This is the stage of reproduction of author’s words and translation of his thoughts into one’s own words. Here the reader recognizes word meaning, the sentence and paragraph meaning and the meaning of continuous written discourse. He understands tbe main idea in a passage and follows the sequence of ideas expressed in it. He follows the author’s arguments, genera­lizations and conclusions. In short, the reader has to under­stand what the author is saying though he may not go deep into it.
Interpretation of Meaning–The second level of comprehen­sion is interpretative level. This involves grasping implied and inferred meanings, reading critically, or reading between the lines. The mature reader recognizes the author’s motives, intention and purpose, interprets his thought, passes judgment on his statements, assesses the relevance of the material read, summarizes the passage, selects the suitable title and identifies the tone of the passage. He establishes a purpose for reading, draws and supports conclusions and makes inferences or pre­dictions. This is also known critical reading. In the words of Strang (1961), “Critical reading involves the examination of ideas. Students should examine a sweeping generalization, state it in their own words, note the evidence offered in support of it, check it against their own experience and information, and finally give their considered appraisal of the statement”.
Evaluation of Meaning-Evaluation involves critical reaction to the material read, which may include many intellectual processes such as discriminating, imagining, analysing, judging and problem-solving. It also involves deriving implications, speculating about consequences, and drawing generalizations not stated by the author, i.e., ‘reading beyond the lines’. On this level, the reader may arrange the author’s ideas into new patterns by extending their scope or fusing them with ideas that he himself has gained from reading or from experience.
While doing so the reader first evaluates the meaning gained through interpretation of the material read. He maintains an objective attitude which demands proof or checking of sources, and evaluates the statements that conflict with or contradict one another. He detects special pleading, such as, emotional appeal or propaganda, and understands that the materials will differ greatly in validity and reliability because of the time of writing, pressure of circumstances, bias of writer and many other factors. Strang (1967) is of the view that by means of both analysis and synthesis, the reader gains a new insight or a higher level of understanding that enables him to reflect on the significance of the ideas. In this rewarding type of reading, he brings initiative, originality and thought to bear on the literal meaning of the printed page.

Reaction

Effective writing arouses in the reader some type of emo­tional reaction, either one of pleasure or indifference or dis­like. Strang and others (1961, p. 14) observed that “a piece of writing may evoke feelings of pleasure in the author’s felicity of expression, approval of his point of view, sympathe­tic understandings of his characters, delight, or exultation. Or it may evoke’ feelings of boredom, annoyance, prejudice, dislike, resentment, or fear.” Great books or poems may be a source of self-revelation-they stimulate us to explore our­ selves and our world. One appreciates reading if he is interested in it and if he reacts appropriately to the excellent qualities which good reading matter possesses. If students read crea­tively, they involve themselves in the book or article, empa­thizing with a fictional or real character as he fights and suffers. Some degree of emotional involvement in the article or book is basic to creative reading. A mature reader must react to What he reads in order to make his reading effective and pur­poseful.

Application

Most certainly the highest level of reading process is the application of what is read to one’s own life. This application of what is read is called creative or integrative reading. ‘Inte­gration of what is read requires that the reader should be able to take understandings, knowledge and attitudes gained in reading and apply them to the solving of his own problems or to the improvement of his own life’ (Miller, 1972). Unless the reader makes use of ideas he gains from reading, the act of reading may have little significance as a means of improving his thinking and his ways of living. According to Yoakam (1955) the ability to use ideas gained from reading depends on the reader’s skill in comprehension, organization, and retention of ideas and upon his ability to gain new ideas and to develop new appreciations. His mind must be alert and he must be willing to make an effort to profit from what he reads.
There is such a wide range of reading materials available today that it should certainly be possible to find books that will be of much use to an individual. The ideas gained through reading must be reflected in his conversation or discussion, and should modify his judgments, increase understanding and suggest new ways of behaviour resulting into all round develop­ment of personality.

Unit -3 Readability –concept,reading rate etc.

Readabiltiy :
The reading ability of a person is nothing but a person’s rate of reading + his or her comprehension of the text given. The reading ability will be decided by number of factors.

Factors affecting readability
· Difficulty level of the text in terms of its linguistic aspect
· Difficulty level of the content involved
· Reader’s familiarity with the text
· Reader’s own linguistic abilities, comprehension and other cognitive abilities such as reasoning, applying , evaluating etc
· Prior knowledge –experiences of a reader
· Reader’s own emotional state of mind during reading
· Physical environment
· Reader’s reading habits
· Type and length of the material involved for reading
· Time given for reading
· Purpose for reading

Rate of reading-concept
· Reading at a rapid rate is of little value if one understands little of what has been read.
· Reading with a high degree of comprehension without caring much about the time spent in reading will be of very little sue.
· Thus both the sped of reading and simultaneously understanding the text are important.
· Bond & Tinker opine that a definition of rate of reading must be redefined as a rate of comprehension of printed & written material.

Reading rate/speed
· Number of words read within any given time period

Causes of slow reading rate

· Vocalization: vocalization is mouthing the word while reading or using the vocal muscles without making any sound. Vocalization is an unnecessary & deterimental habit and should be avoided. Words are read pronounced aloud as they are read.
· Sub vocalization: it is similar to vocalization. However there is no body movement. Lips tongue or vocal cords do not move, but inner type of speech persists within the students mind, he is saying each word to himself clearly pronouncing each word and then listening to himself. This could also be termed as mental speech. In realty this is the thinking process in operation.
· Supports or pointing at words: here the reader points to words in the text with a finger or a pencil or a ruler. It is used for supporting the mind to increase the concentration. However this slows down the reading speed as one’s hand or the ruler or finger cannot move as fast as mind is capable of. There is slow down of the reading speed through mechanical movement of pencil or ruler or finger etc.

Techniques of developing reading rate

· Giving lot of practice of reading different types of reading so as to create a wider knowledge base
· Developing comprehension strategies such as context clues, using dictionary, finding the key words/phrases/paragraphs, omitting descriptions and irrelevant information, encircling important details
· Developing skills to carry out different types of reading such as scanning, skimming
· Developing vocabulary
· Giving time bound reading exercises
· Providing purposeful reading
· Developing linguistic competence mainly in terms of grammar of the language
· Giving guided reading with questions given in advance

Elective -educational research -Unit-3 -Experimental research:

Nature, Definitions:
Experiment refers to the process of studying the effect of independent variables on the dependent variables under the controlled conditions.
According to Best (1977) Experimental research is the description and analysis of what will be or what will occur , under carefully controlled conditions.

Variables are the conditions or characteristics that the experimenter manipulates, controls or observes.
Variables are constructs which varies according to the conditions.
Variables could be an I.Q, a particular teaching method, teaching material, sex, a particular course, temperature, aptitude, attitude, aggression, aspiration, learning style, self esteem, and teaching style and so on.

Independent variables:
The independent variables are the conditions or characteristics that the experimenter manipulates or controls in his or her attempt to ascertain their relationship to observed phenomena.
Dependent variables: The dependent variables are conditions or characteristics that appear, disappear or change as the experimenter introduces, removes or changes independent variables.
Independent variables are of two types
Organismic variables or attributive variables: these variables cannot be manipulated by the experimenter. For instance, Sex, I.Q., race, age
Treatment variables: these are the variables that the experimenter manipulates and to which he or she assigns subjects. For instance, teaching method, teaching material, strategy etc.
Confounding variables: confounding variables are those aspects of study or sample that might influence the dependent variables (outcome measure) and whose effect may be confused with the effects of the independent variable.
Confounding variables are of two types: Intervening and extraneous variables

Extraneous variables: they are those uncontrolled variables (variables not controlled by the experimenter) that may have significant influence on the results of the study.
Intervening variables:
Certain variables that cannot be controlled or measured directly have an important effect on the outcome. These modifying variables intervene between the cause and the effect is known as intervening variables. For example anxiety, fatigues, motivation on the part of the subjects during the treatment have their impact on the results of the study.

Characteristics of experimental research
Control :
Creating an environment so that the effects of the desired variables can be measured objectively. Control can reduce the effect of extraneous variables to the minimum.
Manipulation:
Increasing or decreasing or removing independent variables to study the effect on dependent variables
Observation:
Manipulating the independent variables and carefully observing and recording the effects of this manipulation on the dependent variables or some measurable behavior of the sample.
Replication:
Replication of the study to take care of lacunae observed in the study.

Steps of experimental research
· Introduction-conceptual framework of the selected problem of the study
· Review of the related literature
· Rationale of the study
· Research questions
· Statement of the problems
· Operationalization of the terms/variables
· Extraneous variables
· Hypothesis
· Population
· Sample
· Data collection tools
· Data analysis techniques
· Reference
Designs of experimental research

Experimental design is the blue print of the procedures that enable the researcher to test hypotheses by reaching valid conclusions about relationships between independent variables and dependent variables. Selection of a particular design is based on the purposes of the experiment, the type of variables to be manipulated, and the conditions or limiting factors under which it is conducted. The design deals with such practical problems as how subjects are to be assigned to experimental and control groups , the way variables are to be manipulated and controlled , the way extraneous variables are to be controlled , how observations are to be made, and the type of statistical analysis to be employed in interpreting the data relationships.
Campbell and Stanley (1966) has used following symbol system for discussing experimental designs
R random assignment of subjects to groups or treatments
X exposure of a group to an experimental (treatment) variable
C exposure of a group to the control condition
O observation or test administered
Following are the research designs
1 Pre-experimental design: Here there is no control group. Even if it there is no way of equating the group. Following are the sub research designs under it.

1.1 The one group, pre test-post design
O1 X O2 ,
O1 =Pre test O2 = Post test

Effectiveness of the experiment is measured by finding the difference between the mean scores of pre test and post test.
1.2 The static group comparison design

X O
C O

This design compares the status of a group that has received an experimental treatment with one that has not. There is no provision for establishing the equivalence of the experimental and control groups, a very serious limitation.

2 true experimental design:
In a true experimental design, the equivalence of the experimental and control groups is provided through random assignments of subjects to experimental and control treatments.

2.1 The post test onlyequivalentgroups designs
R X O1
R C O2

Here the subjects are assigned through random way (R) to both the groups and groups are thus equated. Then one group is given the treatment (X) and the other is the controlled group (C) which is not given the treatment or may be given the treatment other that the one used for experimental group. At the end of the treatment, tests are administered (O1 for experimental group and O2 for control group). The difference between the mean scores of both the groups are calculated through‘t’ test for statistical significance.

2.2 The pre test post test equivalent group design
R O1 X O2 O1 O3 = pre test scores
R O3 C O4 O2 O4 = post test scores

Here the subjects are assigned through random way (R) to both the groups and groups are thus equated. The pre test scores are conducted for both the groups and the difference in the mean scores is measured. Then one group is given the treatment (X) and the other is the controlled group (C) which is not given the treatment or may be given the treatment other that the one used for experimental group. Afterwards the post tests are conducted for both the groups and the difference between the mean scores are calculated.

3. Quasi experimental design
The pretest-post test non equivalent groups design
O1 X O2 O1 O3=pre tests
O3 C O4 O2 O4= post tests
The entire procedure in this design is same as mentioned above in 2.2 except that the groups are not equated.

Unit-3 Historical research

Purpose: Studying events or ideas of past or philosophy of persons and groups at any remote point of time.
Nature: Definitions:
According to Nel (1983), historical research is the process of collecting and objectively evaluating data related to past occurrences to arrive at conclusions about the causes, effects or trends of past events that may be helpful in explaining the present or anticipating future events.

According to Young (1987), historical research can illuminate current problems and act as temporary influence. There is a need for historical research to produce a faithful record of events. There is need also for historical research aimed at suggesting through a study of previous events, generalizations for guiding behavior.

In views of Mason (1997) the principle product of historical research is context-an understanding of the organizational, individual, social, political and economic circumstances in which phenomena occur.

Steps of historical research
Charles Busha & Stephen Harter have given following steps of historical research
· Recognition of a research problem
· Gathering of as much relevant information about the problem as possible
· If appropriate , the forming of appropriate hypothesis that tentatively explain relationships between historical factors
· Rigorous collection and organization of resources/evidences and the verification of the authenticity and veracity of information and its resources. The researcher can obtain information through following resources
Primary resources: They are those resources that appeared for the first time
· Written documents
· Interviews with people who experienced a particular time frame
· Artifacts, remains or relics
· Oral or written testimony
Secondary resources: Reports of a person who relates the testimony of an actual witness of an event or an actual participant in the same.
· Selection, organization and analysis of the most pertinent collected evidence and the drawing of the conclusions and
· Recoding of the conclusions in a meaningful narration
Joanna Nel (1983) has given six steps of historical research
· Selecting a suitable topic
· Searching for evidence
· Taking notes
· Arranging the information into a meaningful pattern
· Presenting results in a way that provides the reader with a full understanding of the subject.
Methods: analysis of historical records, analysis of documents
Techniques:
o Reading of notes-content analysis
o Tap and film listening and analysis
o Statistical compilations and manipulations
o Reference and abstract guides-content analysis
o Interviews with subjects, anecdotal records –content analysis
o Archives-analysis and thorough studies
o Observing and studying the remains

Unit-4 Steps of proposal writing

· Introduction-conceptual framework of the selected problem of the study
· Review of the related literature
· Rationale of the study
· Research questions (if any)
· Statement of the problem
· Operationalization of the terms/variables
· Extraneous variables (if any)
· Hypothesis (if any)
· Population
· Sample
· Data collection tools
· Data analysis techniques
· Reference

Elective -educational research Unit-4 Selection of a research problem

For selecting the problem, the researcher has to read various types of literature available in the field. There are research journals which publish results of completed research works, ongoing research works. They also publish articles on current trends on the research in the various fields. Similarly, within a specific field also there are thrust areas of researches which are identified and presented in such periodicals. Thus, the researcher has to read and ponder over the available literature in the field and should decide the research problem. While selecting the research problem, the following considerations are also worthy of consideration;

1. Is this the type of problem that can be effectively solved through the process of research? Can relevant data be gathered to test the theory or find the answer to the question under consideration?
2. Is the problem significant? Is an important principle involved? Would the solution make any difference as far as educational theory or practice is concerned? If not, there are undoubtedly more significant problems waiting to be investigated?
3. Is the problem a new one? Is the answer already available? Ignorance of prior studies may lead an investigator to spend time needlessly on a problem already investigated by some other worker.
4. Is research on the problem feasible? Although the problem may be a good one, is it a good problem for me? Will be able to carry it through to a successful conclusion? some of the questions the researchers should consider are the following ;
· Am I competent to plan and carry out a study of this type? Do I know enough about this field to understand its significant aspects and to interpret my findings? Am I skillful enough to develop, administer and interpret necessary data- gathering tools and procedures?
· Are pertinent data available? Are valid and reliable data gathering devices and procedures available? Will I get permission for collecting the data from the concerned samples?
· Will I have the necessary financial resources to carry on this study? What will be the expenses involved in data –gathering equipment, printing, test materials, travel, and clerical help?
· Will I have enough time to complete the project? Will there be time to devise the procedures, select the data gathering devices, gather and analysis the data and complete the research the project?
· Will I have the determination to pursue the study despite the difficulties and social constraints that may be involved? Will I be able to succeed when dta are difficult to gather and when others are reluctant to cooperate?

Unit 2-Dramatization method

Dramatization is one of the most joyful and interesting ways of learning a language particularly in case of Sanskrit as Sanskrit literature abounds in dramas. There are lot of ancient literature available which includes simple stories of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. Similarly there are well known dramas from the pens of classical writers.
Merits of Dramatization
Ø An actual environment related to the episodes, events can be created as the students wear costumes, prepare speeches etc. All these help in making understanding is easier.
Ø The students get lot of oral practice in Sanskrit which helps in improving pronunciation and fluency in the language. They understand how to speak different words with correct intonation and expressions.
Ø The students play the drama which requires team work so group learning ensures better language learning.
Ø It is interesting activity which includes lot of fun. The students have to act the characters so the students get better insights into the ancient characters, events, episodes. The students are actively involved as they can feel the emotions of the characters which they play. All senses are actively involved so learning is better.
Ø The dramatization includes development of skills like listening, speaking and reading and even writing if creative dramas are written in Sanskrit by the students.
Ø There is a deviation from the regular teaching so it is innovative and creates interest among students.

The teacher can ask the students to play the dramas given in the textbooks or can select some well known episodes from the literary works, make the students understand them and give enough practice to rehearse it. The dramas can also be presented in the annual function of the school. The teacher can also write small drama script related to modern topics such as cleanliness, environment etc. and can encourage students to stage may be in the school or near by community.
Limitations of Dramatization
Ø It is time consuming.
Ø If not guided properly it might create disinterest among students.
Ø In absence of practice, it might be difficult for students to stage the dramas in Sanskrit.
Ø It requires knowledge of Sanskrit dramas on the part of teachers.